top of page

What is Psychometric Testing?

Writer: Lee Woodrow
Lee Woodrow
Nov 15, 2021
3 min read

Updated: Apr 20, 2022

Psychometric testing aims to measure attributes, including intelligence, aptitude and personality. Generally psychometric testing is completed online, although some paper questionnaires still remain. Most tests are timed, but some are completed in multiple sittings. The testing provides potential employers with insight into how well candidates work with others, how well they handle stress and whether they will be able to cope with the intellectual demands of the job. Tests fall into two main categories: personality tests, which measure aspects of personality, and aptitude tests, which measure intellectual and reasoning abilities.


PERSONALITY TESTS

The idea behind these tests is that it’s possible to quantify a candidate’s personality by knowing how they felt, thought and behaved in a variety of situations (both at work and outside of work). There are lots of tests, such as the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), which places candidates in one of 16 personality groups, and the Occupational Personality Questionnaire (OPQ), which checks that the candidate’s personality fits with the job.


There are no right or wrong answers with personality tests and to encourage reflection, they aren’t typically completed under exam conditions.


APTITUDE TESTS

There are at least 5,000 aptitude and ability tests on the market. Some of them contain only one type of question (for example, questions involving verbal or numerical reasoning) while others are made up of different types. Aptitude tests consist of multiple-choice questions and are administered under exam conditions. They are strictly timed, and a typical test might allow thirty minutes for approximately thirty questions. Accuracy as well as speed of response is usually measured. Intelligence levels are compared to a standard, meaning that candidates must achieve a certain score to pass. Common tests include:

NUMERICAL REASONING

Numerical reasoning tests are designed to test your knowledge on a range of subjects, including: Financial analysis and data interpretation, currency conversion, percentages, ratios, number sequences and more. All these topics directly to how you will cope with the job. However, as we will soon explain, there is a wide range of numerical reasoning tests from various providers, including SHL, Revelian and Talent Q, among others.


Considering that you will be sending out CVs to multiple companies, it is incumbent to ready yourself for a multitude of numerical reasoning test scenarios. From tables and graphs to currency & unit conversion, percentages and more, tests will differ in both their difficulty levels, time frames and even question-answer structure.


VERBAL REASONING

Verbal reasoning tests are a common type of aptitude or psychometric used in job recruitment. They are mainly used to measure your ability to understand, analyse and interpret written information. There are many different assessment companies with a wide assortment of tests for different sectors, position and job levels, but the basic question types remain the same.


SPATIAL REASONING

Spatial reasoning tests, also known as spatial awareness tests, examine orientation skills in two dimensional and three dimensional spaces. Popular spatial reasoning tests include:


  1. Organising two dimensional shapes

  2. Spatial reasoning cubes

  3. Mirror images

  4. Perspectives


DIAGRAMMATIC REASONING

Diagrammatic reasoning tests, often confused with abstract reasoning, inductive reasoning and deductive logical thinking tests, are aptitude tests administered by assessment companies. Unlike non-verbal reasoning tests, diagrammatic reasoning tests display a series of operators and outputs from which a candidate is to infer a set of rules and apply them to new situations.



Need help with your CV? Lee Woodrow has helped 1000's of Executives, Managers and Engineers with high-end CV Writing and LinkedIn Optimisation.




4 Comments


ngoongniepgangvoat.1.24.5
3 days ago

32WIN ừ mình cũng thấy vậy nè, kiểu lướt qua thôi mà vẫn dễ nắm. Mình thích cái cách họ để menu khá lộ và bấm cái là nhảy qua lại giữa các mục liền, không phải mò mẫm hay kéo tìm thanh điều hướng như vài trang hay làm khó người dùng; nhìn chung mấy phần quan trọng nằm ngay tầm mắt nên thao tác nhanh, nhất là khi đang dùng điện thoại thì đỡ bực. Với lại nội dung họ chia thành từng khối rõ ràng, kéo xuống là thấy từng mảng tách ra rành rọt nên mắt mình đỡ phải căng ra đọc, cảm giác mọi thứ được “đặt đúng chỗ” chứ không nhét lung tung. Nói…

Like

savannapatt.er.s.on.7.0.4
4 days ago

https://rr88m1.com/ đang nói nhiều về chuyện nguồn gốc với pháp lý nên mình tiện ghé qua xem họ trình bày ra sao, kiểu xem có ghi rõ ràng hay lại giấu trong mấy trang phụ khó tìm. Vào rồi thì thấy bố cục chia khối khá rành mạch, lướt xuống là gặp ngay phần thông tin giới thiệu theo dạng box nên đọc nhanh được, chữ với khoảng cách dòng nhìn đỡ rối. Mình cũng thử bấm qua vài mục trong menu cho biết. Tải trang và chuyển mục ổn, cảm giác thao tác khá trơn tru. Không đào sâu game hay ưu đãi gì, chỉ kiểm tra giao diện với cách sắp xếp thôi. Điểm mình để ý là…

Like

jennysilva3.2.3.12
Aug 20

https://stratea.ai/ showed up in a convo about planning tools, so I opened it just to see what the site looked like. I didn’t run a full generator or anything, but the messaging made sense fast — they call out that “generic AI chat” thing where you keep re-prompting and still end up piecing together market/pricing/execution on your own. That’s basically been my experience, so it felt oddly familiar. What I liked most was how readable the page is: it doesn’t dump a giant essay on you, it just walks you down the problem and the alternative in a simple flow. The comparison-style chunks are stacked cleanly and the headings make it easy to skim without losing your place.

Like

katrinacha.vez.52.0.2
Aug 07

Trước đây mình cũng hay lướt mấy bài kiểu phân tích để đọc cho biết, chứ không coi đó là chân lý. Có thời điểm mình bị cuốn vào cảm giác “lần này chắc ăn”, cứ ngồi canh số rồi tự làm mình căng thẳng vì nghĩ ngợi quá nhiều. Về sau mình đổi thói quen: đọc để xem người viết suy luận ra sao, họ dựa vào chu kỳ, thống kê hay chỉ là kinh nghiệm cá nhân, rồi chọn lọc cái nào hợp lý với mình. Mình còn thử ghi chú lại vài dự đoán của bản thân, sau đó đối chiếu để xem có bị cảm tính hay thiên kiến không, thấy cũng giúp đầu óc tỉnh…

Like
bottom of page